The New York times in June

The New York times in June 12 and 20 editorial published commentary and said: 10 years of transgenic technology product development general invalid, fail to fulfill that promise lessons, human gene function has not yet fully understood. Even understand, is unlikely to develop for human health and ecological and environmental protection technology products and processing method. Yunan university social and economic behavior research center GuXiuLin don’t defend the new generation of transgenic technology. She thinks that life is a natural evolution, whether “insert genes” or “gene silence”Mbt shoes usa is the interference of the microscopic structure and function of life, are against the real life science. In life all genes in the process of interaction forever, enhance, or weakening them, the consequences are unpredictable. “Gm this article technical route fundamentally be wrong, in a wrong route abduct is curved continue to walk, mbt footwear don’t may correct route mistake.” “From a long-term perspective, the development of transgenic technology may finally have brings human welfare, but who also dare not and cannot ensure that must happen.” The New York times said. (sel out)

GuXiuLin professor book about gm’s new book is publishing process, estimates that over time can meet with readers. Professor gu oneself to the new book of, also have a little contribution, q. the computation.mbt online The international herald herald “this report illustrates a fact, transgenic technology input use since 10 years, the harm has become more and more obvious, the United States government finally begins to turn. Even specializes in transgenic technology development of American biotechnology company, also had to real “environmentally friendly”, “the protection of health” for, the development of the “second generation” transgenic technology, to replace “first generation” transgenic technology. It actually comes from another side admitted, mbt on sale“first generation” transgenic technology is not the “environmentally friendly”, not “the protection of health”. While in our country, transgenic technology still stay in American so-called “first generation” basis. So, so far, all domestic support transgenic technology experts defense, can be regarded as nonsense and lies, all can be thrown into a dump. Don’t get “science” of name to scare people